Jump to content
MakeWebGames

Vps to good to be true


grant

Recommended Posts

Well... seems absurdly low price if the CPU is good. Also note that you don't know the actual speed of the CPU, so you may get indeed a 2 core VM, but running extremely slow.

I have however some doubts about the overall quality of the service... I mean, it's cheap... too cheap to be any good.

BTW note the following:

Unlimited traffic: No additional costs due to traffic (if average traffic consumption continuously exceeds 20 Mbit/s over a timespan of at least 5 days the connection is switched to 10 Mbit/s).

Written at the very bottom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a change.... they are good VPS servers running i7 2600 CPU

Giga have been around for awhile. Its always good to do your research before selecting where to host.

 

Intel® Core i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz

 

Benchmark Run: Tue Jul 31 2012 12:04:54 - 12:32:59

2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 38516279.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Double-Precision Whetstone 4131.4 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)

Execl Throughput 4899.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1225914.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 341121.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 2726784.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Pipe Throughput 2181093.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Pipe-based Context Switching 413680.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Process Creation 14372.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 8063.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1706.4 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)

System Call Overhead 2706634.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38516279.4 3300.5

Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4131.4 751.2

Execl Throughput 43.0 4899.0 1139.3

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1225914.4 3095.7

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 341121.0 2061.2

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 2726784.1 4701.4

Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2181093.8 1753.3

Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 413680.5 1034.2

Process Creation 126.0 14372.8 1140.7

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 8063.0 1901.6

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1706.4 2844.1

System Call Overhead 15000.0 2706634.6 1804.4

========

System Benchmarks Index Score 1859.6

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Benchmark Run: Tue Jul 31 2012 12:32:59 - 13:01:03

2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 76728202.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Double-Precision Whetstone 8259.5 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Execl Throughput 11063.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1659117.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 454014.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 4231458.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Pipe Throughput 4392731.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Pipe-based Context Switching 831343.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

Process Creation 33602.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 12960.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1749.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)

System Call Overhead 4779673.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 76728202.7 6574.8

Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8259.5 1501.7

Execl Throughput 43.0 11063.0 2572.8

File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 1659117.1 4189.7

File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 454014.3 2743.3

File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 4231458.1 7295.6

Pipe Throughput 12440.0 4392731.0 3531.1

Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 831343.4 2078.4

Process Creation 126.0 33602.2 2666.8

Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 12960.9 3056.8

Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1749.9 2916.5

System Call Overhead 15000.0 4779673.3 3186.4

========

System Benchmarks Index Score 3207.2

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Uhh... i7-2600 is a really bad choice for a server.

Well it would depend on several things.

What version of the 2600 it is as there is 3 and the intended use for it.

Its like going to purchase a PC people just instantly gravitate to the one thats advertised as a 3.6ghz or the highest advertised speed rate and ram when what they should be doing is looking at bench marks for their intended use.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...