Wickidnezz

not to be rude or anything but this is kind of what I would see as a useless update as you simply basically slapped in a table with a bordering and added a dotted border around the notepad otherwise no "real" changes

  I guess its a good thing the $25 I am asking is what I have into the domain then huh

http://who.securepaynet.net/whois.aspx?domain=convicted-streetz.com&prog_id=459575 http://who.godaddy.com/whois.aspx?domain=convicted-streetz.com&prog_id=GoDaddy guess again but I guess it all depends on what whois site your using because they all do not show the full whois information, but eh theres godaddy and part of my site stating otherwise so

uniqueness

^^^FIRST POST UPDATED^^^ 100% wrong Registered through: Wickid Corporation Domain Name: CONVICTED-STREETZ.COM Created on: 14-Jan-10 Expires on: 03-Mar-15 Last Updated on: 08-Oct-12

Domain For Sale Up for sale is Convicted-Streetz.com which is just the domain. Details: Domain: Convicted-Streetz.com Registered: 1/14/2010 Expires On: 3/3/2015 Status: Active I am asking $25, however offers are welcome   Registered through: Wickid Corporation Domain Name: CONVICTED-STREETZ.COM Created on: 14-Jan-10 Expires on: 03-Mar-15 Last Updated on: 08-Oct-12 http://who.securepaynet.net/whois.aspx?domain=convicted-streetz.com&prog_id=459575 http://who.godaddy.com/whois.aspx?domain=convicted-streetz.com&prog_id=GoDaddy

no offence but I can offer better VDS(Virtual Dedicated Servers) then that website

you say you have no advertising on your site hmm why is it when I just looked at your site I seen right off the bat 3 Adchoices ads eh just looking threw the 3 pages theres a total of 7 Adchoices ads

peter I would hate to burst your bubble but the site is mccodes how do I know you ask? simply because I have a copy of it lmao

I will not lie it looks pixelated around the wording on the buttons and over all it seems to be a black background with a image and the middle and few buttons poorly made with a input form equaling a okay job if its the first time creating a login but other then that I find it shitty looking

only time the code shows fine with firefox is if you aint logged into the forum

that would be correct lols <a href="url">Link text</a><br /> or <a href="url">Link text</a><br>   either way works

they're both alright?? on what planet may I ask?? 000webhosting.com and x10hosting.com are **** and I do believe you made a typo when you posted 000webhosting.com as it's 000webhost.com but anyway they're both **** while crons are supported they are limited and with x10 you got a file upload restriction if you go over you have to wait awhile

not to be a ass or anything but I think he is looking more long term not short term which best way to go is unlimited shared hosting that supports crons 100% if you don't want that VPS or Dedi is what you would be wanting to go for

what you use to sell this? lmao what idiot in their right mind would even think about buying this when it's a basic explore page with a table around it

the arguement/topic of dmca isn't about if it is or isn't a us law but rather if it's legal which it isn't which means a person/company would not have to take any action about a "take down notice" but a_bertrand here's something you might like to add to your "copyright info post"   also that is from http://www.copyright.gov/title17/

DMCA isn't legal therefore you do not not need to listen

not true due to I use firefox 9.0.1 and it does not display code thats wrapped in a [ code ] tag or [ php ] as long as I am logged in, that basically tells me it's a forum issue based on how it has been installed/updated

a_bertrand I think it's time you make a trip to the bloody eye doctor as if you look here "the basic generic copyright when one creates something which is not actually LEGAL therefore no legal action could be taken" and don't try to belittle me I have contacted the Canadian Intellectual Property Office - Website:www.cipo.ic.gc.ca/ for my own reasons and they actually told me the same thing "the basic generic copyright when one creates something which is not actually LEGAL therefore no legal action could be taken" but in different wording and if my memory serves correct dabomstew was 15 years old when he started mccodes therefore a 15 year old cannot obtain a legal copyright and it is easy to take action against someone stealing your creative work if its LEGALLY copyrighted so don't try and tell me about things that I actually looked into for my own reasons when I know what I talking about and what you guys have wrote in a forum post is inncorrect in order to be able to take any legal action the copyright must be LEGAL which means registered eh with that said I suggest you or whoever got that information in the posts above Dominion referred me to should go back to reading about copyrights. anything more you care to tell me about this do threw inbox

Dominion the second link is not even written in legal form and only sort of copyright mccodes holds is the basic generic copyright when one creates something which is not actually LEGAL therefore no legal action could be taken and mccodes using a service from DMCA to attempt to have websites using a non valid license taken down which again is not a legal service as I have personally contacted them about there services and asked if they were legal and they told me no they was not

look at lines 1-5 and you should find   <?php $housequery=1; include "globals.php"; print "<h3>General Info:</h3>"; $exp=(int)($ir['exp']/$ir['exp_needed']*100);   and your wanting print "<h3>General Info:</h3>"; only difference from what I've posted is this is from MCv2.0.2 and what Mystical had posted is from MCv2.0.3 which is all found in the index.php and if I am correct I do belive the redux index file would be the same

Nickson I think you are the one who is confused as linux is a open source OS to begin with unless your talking about fedora redhat and such but there are so many different versions of linux that are open source from get go like ubuntu,mint linux and few others and as for comparing a internet product to a car is not exactly irrelevant in this case and mccodes doesn't even own a legal copyright or a business license to begin with and if you can get a system that is well known for free in my mind it is considered open source

to be fair nickson if I were to create something like a game engine and sell it I would have it setup so there was no possible way to exploit it or run it without a license and yes in my mind I do belive mcv2.0.2 is open source due to anyone can obtain it without a license

further more he is using a .tk domain which is registered at http://dot.tk as free domain that being said javance has no legal rights to the domain unless he opts to pay them for the register of the domain and by a quick look at his website it appears he is using mccodes v2.0.2 also BioHazard having a license or not will not determine if a error gets shown as you stated and like Chicka said mccodes will not do anything about a game running without a license and cannot do anything to be fair in my point of view mccodes v2.0.2 is basically a open source engine now as all you got to do is google "mccodes v2.0.2 and you can find on average without any digging 5 downloads if not more for the engine. also javance I have registered on your website name is same as you see here

very nice illusions :P just a thought tho instead of the users being sent to the hospital after the allotted time why not just make it like a stalemate attack where they both lose and don't gain anything