Jump to content
MakeWebGames

Paul Evans

Members
  • Posts

    783
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Paul Evans

  1. Paul Evans

    deleted

    I've never actually heard of that script but if your on wamp simply do some tests... i would look for any info or read me files.
  2. if i remember correctly CB told me MC v1 was released quickly due to someone releasing a none complete version (someone from their server/team i guess) so v2 came out rapidly also which was a fuller and more complete version and MC is a script based on the work of ched burn's TC.
  3. when....
  4. Wouldn't be difficult i did say it was insecure to them they payed no notice so it kind of serves them right. I still think decio was just mates with one of the newbs on here who call themselves security experts (or maybe one of them).
  5. i've never looked at grpg script seems pointless to boarder ones horizon when the thing is rarely used. Dylan i wonder if you just post for the fun of it...
  6. that's what kyle said... nuff said Zap, ezrpg... gprg there is so much more than MCC i mean CG is custom built and that's taking a while wouldn't like to think about making an engine too much work but CG is rather customisable from the user side it's possible it may transform to a engine in the future (just a word to the wise for the MCC team, my shit will be secure...). CG can change from mafia to pirate in afew swoops of the keyboard (minus the images and afew functions) so a engine from it would be easily done just a generic version of CG really. (i'd sell my beautiful custom build 100% Paul Evans mods obviously)
  7. ah but ctype_digit allowed decimals... so really if your gunna filter properly it would be wise to take that in account
  8. been awhile but i thought ctype_digit checks for -+ symbols so why use absolute and integer
  9. %u allows different results when inputting a negative number i believe (i personally don't use sprintf at all on CG so lost track)
  10. i guess because it took like 28 second more time to hack it than the older one... due to lag...
  11. wouldn't %d be a better solution?
  12. still waste of time why not make it optional to see the threads older than a year even if people have posted on it lately
  13. so you get a percentage of mcv2 patched when it comes out? so if it gets hacked by someone when it's fully released do you give that percentage back or do you keep it and get another percentage of the next patch?
  14. you see the date the person last replied (last time i looked) and maybe the creation date but you don't know that convo isn't still going on... PS unban me from IRC that lame bot dislikes me saying goats ill report it's ass lol
  15. just for the record it is a percentage right im just curious... i won't ask how much just wondering if it's a percentage of sales.
  16. just curious but jordan are you saying we shouldn't check out unread posts? That's fine by me i have 26 pages of the crap i need to sort through... lol be easier just to say 'hey if you don\'t like how we do it then piss off' lol just have that at the beginning of the site where people signup im sure it will keep the few members MWG has left:P
  17. why use %u (just curious)
  18. kk on msn later ;) good man
  19. how much :D
  20. im confused who owns mwg and can code... serious question... i actually like the idea i mean i see newbs doing it all the time and it would take what 20 minutes to lock all the topics from 1 year or more ago ... timestamp ain't hard to work with. plus no offence to the newb but it does get annoying 1 year gaps in convos.
  21. lol danny pm me what you said i missed it Jordan: research? no research needed go through every file and consider using a little thing called logic you may make 1 or even maybe 2 mistakes but im sure someone will point it out. They created the engine a long time ago and still people who are working with it actually made more sense of it than them (IE you being employed (i hope they pay you)).
  22. the new website is up isn't it... lol or are you guys wasting more time editing the mcc main website and not patching the immediate issues with the scripts already sold... im sure you guys love wasting time it did take what 3+ years for a patch of v2/v1 to be released and they sucked... damn i even contributed to finding exploits on them samples... v2 still has my website in the announcements lol shows how much mcc really care about the code.
  23. whats that new mc base or mc scripture? still funny...
  24. ok the first one is funny because your selling a product and yet your saying it's a high possibility to be hacked and then saying if the source is stolen by a hacker due to bad coding or the users fault then it's their problem... wow The second one is funny because on here more MC copyrighted code as actually been posted than anything else so that's totally against that rule/guideline who wrote this crap lol
  25. Naw it's v2 i remember logging in on it and telling them it was insecure then being banned lol
×
×
  • Create New...